Garmin Forerunner 305 Review (part 1) - What’s in the box?
I’ve always been a Polar heart rate monitor user before but having not been best pleased that the strap broke on my RS400sd after less than a year, I decided to buy a Garmin Forerunner 305.
I carried out a lot of research online before buying my Polar RS400sd last year - and on the whole every comparison I saw was Polar vs Garmin. And it boiled down to one thing - footpod technology vs GPS technology.
For those that don’t know, footpods are small devices that attach to your trainers and have some cunning technology inside that somehow manage to work out how far your feet are moving when running. GPS however, means that your location is constantly monitored by satellites in order to work out the distance (and therefore speed) of your run. Footpods are the option if you go with Polar, whereas Garmin use GPS.
In the past I was really put off by many posts and discussions I read that said that in cloudy conditions or built up areas it was really difficult to get satellite receptions. However, two things changed my mind on buying a Garmin Forerunner 305…. Firstly, most of the negative posts I read were posted a good couple of years ago, and from what I could see the chip inside the Garmin had been updated quite recently. And secondly, my Dad got a Garmin Edge (for cycling) at Christmas and having seen it pick up lots of satellites whilst sitting in my living room, I assumed that things had indeed moved on!
There’s probably a third reason too… I’m now a Mac user, and Polar offers absolutely no support whatsoever for Mac users. I find this absolutely unbelievable. I therefore don’t want to spend time using a gadget that produces stacks of data that I can’t review on my computer of choice!
So anyway, having the tendency to make the odd impulse buy I decided to buy a Garmin Forerunner 305…. and now it has arrived.
What comes with the Garmin Forerunner 305?
Now, I know that first impressions shouldn’t be everything, but I was quite impressed by the packaging of the Garmin…

Nice box, eh?
Right, let’s open her up…

- The wrist unit
First impressions are good. One of the other reasons I wasn’t keen on the Garmin Forerunner 305 in the past was the perceived size of the wrist unit. Now it’s here it’s a pleasant surprise. It’s no way near as big as I thought it would be. Don’t get me wrong, you would be a bit mad to wear it as a normal watch, but I don’t think it looks as stupid on your wrist as a footpod looks on your trainer! - Interchangeable watch strap
Now, this is a nice touch Garmin include a watchstrap just in case the one included as standard doesn’t fit your wrist! - Screwdriver
An even nicer touch.. a screwdriver in case you do indeed want to change the watch straps! - The Heart Rate Monitor chest strap
This is the strap that goes round your chest (on top of your sternum) to send your heart rate details to the wrist unit. It has the look of an earlier Polar model I used, but it’s much more comfortable. And it’s certainly better than the strap that comes with the Polar RS400sd. The Garmin type is much easier to put on and take off. - USB cable
For attaching the unit to your PC (or in my case my Mac). - The docking cradle
This is what the wrist unit needs to be attached to when you transfer data to and from your PC/Mac. - Charging unit
Needed if you want to charge the unit using a standard wall socket. - Plug
Not much explanation needed for this bit! - 2 pin adapter
- User guides and software
It’s nice that there are two guides - a quick start-up and a full manual. Obviously being a male I decided to scan read the quick start guide!
Right, time to charge the Garmin Forerunner 305 up so it’s ready to use…
Update: Should I now upgrade to a Garmin Forerunner 405?
What to do next...
- Leave a comment about this post
- Read other articles with these tags:
Garmin Forerunner 305, GPS, Heart rate monitor - Visit the homepage to see the latest articles
(This entry was posted on January 11th, 2008.)









Posted by: Ross Kidd
on September 14th, 2008 at 6:02 pm
Thanks for this review. Helped me make up my mind and am very happy with the purchase.
I was worried about the “perceived size” of the watch. It looks huge on the official Garmin shots but is not that big.
Now all I need is the speed/cadence sensor for my bike.
Posted by: Mark Gee
on September 21st, 2008 at 9:37 pm
Have done the same upgrade. I have to say the stats and functionality in the Garmin software are vastly INferior to the Polar.
With my footpod I managed to get a 5k race to show 5005m with my Polar but the Garmin showed 5050m. And Idon’t think I was 50m off the shortest line. I imagine of course that I was more than 5m off course with the polar.
So the GPS is not as good as its cracked up to be (yes obviously your stride length changes with fitness and it is a pain in the B to recalibrate the polar)